(1) Also called the Liberal revolution by their ideology that is at its finest in Locke, Puritan revolution by those who carried it out and glorious revolution that participated in it almost all sectors of society. (2) Is definitely established parliamentary system, that if well already existed for centuries in the tradition English, definitely shifts to absolutism towards a moderate monarchy, whose limits are imposed him by Parliament, becoming the closest of constitutional monarchies antecedent. But the absolutism in the rest of Europe would continue, said Arturo Pellet Lastra in her book the State and historical reality, until the beginning of the 20th century with Federico II of Prussia, Jose II of Austria and Catherine of Russia among others. (3) The Magna Carta of 1215 year is the most important document of the English Constitution, dispersed in nature and contains no doubt the point of departure for the limits to Royal power. (4) The death of King Carlos I was an unnecessary crime, voted in the largest of the illegalities, military break-in at Parliament that expelled supporters of the monarchy to favour the regicide. Likewise the removal of Jacobo II has no supporting legal since religious grounds was violated the legitimate succession. If we analyze the facts from the legal point of view, Guillermo Orange is so usurper as it was Jose I of Spain, with the difference of the apparent consensus surrounding the situation.
Be taken into account that Jacobo II is removed from Office against his will and the throne delivered to his son-in-law and his daughter. In the case of Jose I, monarchs Carlos IV and Fernando VII could not decide on what constituted the farce of Bayonne. However religion was the excuse needed to perfect a form of Government that exists to this day and has been the basis of the system created by the United States a century after this revolution in England.